Wednesday, January 14, 2009

An Ideal Husband Part 3, or "A happy ending after all"

You may recall that the movie version of Oscar Wilde's "An Ideal Husband" is a terrible adaptation, apart from the costumes. Not satisfied, and trying to get the taste out my mouth, I found an old tape of the 1947 version at a marvelous video store that has that sort of thing (tapes, I mean). Even with the poor image quality, muddy sound, and occasional suspenseful moments where it looked like the tape might break, it was a much better viewing experience, because it was a much better movie.

Basically, it was the play. They moved a few scenes and greatly condensed most of the ending, but it held up well. Lord Goring was charming, Mrs. Cheveley was slimy, and the other characters were quite good as well. I liked Miss Mabel, and unlike in the other version, they left her a funny, clever, and minor character. I hate when screenwriters feel the need to make minor female characters show up all over the story and take over (Arwen). But I digress.

I only had a couple of problems with it. There are spoilers in here, so go read the play. I've turned them a parchmenty yellow color, so you can highlight them and read if you want. First, the tremendous condensation of the ending left almost no time for the charming scenes between Lord Goring and Mabel. Her impatience to get Goring to propose to her, and her scolding of him, is so funny in the play, and it was largely left out. I suppose that's minor, but still...

The other problem is also pretty minor, but I find it annoying. Here's a bunch of spoilers. In the play, Lady Chiltern sends Goring a letter asking his help, which Mrs. Cheveley finds, and being a bad person herself, assumes meant she was having an affair with him. After Goring makes Mrs. Cheveley give him the other letter she has, she reveals she has pocketed Lady Chiltern's letter, and runs off. The ending is rather suspenseful because just when Sir Chiltern decides to stick to his guns, and Lord Goring has succeeded in keeping his past a secret, Mrs. Cheveley is scheming away to ruin the Chilterns' marriage again. In both movies, they have Mrs. Cheveley keep Lady Chiltern's letter a secret, and tell Lord Goring she has it after they all go to watch Sir Chiltern give his speech to Parliament (not in the play). While this is a more simple "good guys think they're safe but then the villain has one last trick" twist, I like the extra suspense of knowing her scheme the whole time, and hoping their success won't be ruined, and wondering how they'll get out of it. It works OK either way, but I like the play better. Also, showing the speech in Parliament is boring! It works fine in the play where it cuts to them back at home talking about what a great speech it was, while the audience knows the trouble that the letter could still bring.

Overall, though, it's a pretty good adaptation, and a pretty good movie.

2 comments:

  1. Ahh, remember when they did faithful adaptations in movies?

    Yeah, me either, but at least they didn't stuff a bunch of tokens in a sock and beat the work to death with it, if I might coin an expression. Always they expand minor supporting cast member's roles, to improve their "gender balance," or turn major characters into minorities for no reason except racial quotas. Arwen, in Jackson's LotR, makes me bleed internally (poor Glorfindel--they alway give other people his lines; Bakshi seemed to think you can swap out a Sindar {Legolas) for an Eldar, with no plot difficulties, despite the fact Legolas was never in Valinor and can't call on its Light).

    Maybe the writers of the newer version of Ideal Husband thought women (men don't see Oscar Wilde plays, right? 'Cause he was gay...except he wasn't...) couldn't handle a movie largely about men. It's sorta that whole "girls need role-models" thing that ruins children's shows, except applied to something for grownups.

    It also occurs to me, on a lighter note, that it's severely messed up to name a character who's an MP "Chiltern". See, it's impossible to retire from Parliament; you have to go and request tht you be made "Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds." That, and the fact Parliament was designed not to fit all its members, is why Chesterton called England's, "The most unconstitutional of all Constitutions."

    I will not say what Belloc called it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That girls-need-role-models thing totally bugs me too. Remember when female characters were actually characters, with flaws and things? Like Gadget from Rescue Rangers - sure she was a great inventor, but she had major self-confidence issues that even led her to join a cult at one point. Or Rebecca from Tale Spin (aka baby's first steampunk). She was an entrepreneur and the boss, but she was greedy and her schemes almost always got them all into trouble. However, her toughness and loyalty, as well as that of Balloo, would always win out.

    Actual characters, with actual character traits... those were the days.

    ReplyDelete