Sunday, October 3, 2010

Not the Coming Thing

or, For Science!

~ a short rant ~

I was looking at light bulbs last night, pondering stocking up on a few more incandescent bulbs before they become illegal. But I was also looking at compact fluorescent bulbs, because I do use them in most of my lights, especially the ones I use for extended periods.

I couldn't find any that were the right color, only the hideous bright blue ones, or "Daylight". I prefer "soft white" whereas in incandescent bulbs I prefer "soft white", "Edison", or "reveal", although only in my living room, because it's already purple and looks lovely with the slightly purple light.

All these names are, frankly, ridiculous, with the exception of "soft white", which is pretty understandable. Another point of confusion is brightness. We are used to measuring brightness in watts (this hurts me) despite the fact that the coating on white light bulbs slightly affects the brightness. Watts are a measure of how much power they draw, which is different for fluorescent lamps. At least they tell you what wattage of normal light bulb they look like. LED lights are hopeless in this regard, and they will never ever be able to force me to buy one. They'll have to kill me first.

The proper measure of brightness is lumens, or, alternatively, foot candles. We have a standard, folks, why not use it?

But my biggest problem with all these different bulbs is the color and quality of light. LEDs are out of the question because the quality of light is just not there - it has a weird focus because of the shape of the plastic bubble, and this gives it hideous shadows that I find distracting. The color is also quite ugly - the white light from LEDs is just too blue for my taste, for most applications.

Fluorescent bulbs are ok in terms of quality of light - the shadows are a little murky, but I'll live. My problem with fluorescent bulbs is the color. Not all of them are hideous - they do come in a soft white that looks pretty good to the eye. However, usually they have a horrible green or yellow tinge to them that you can see on film or even in digital photos. It's why most photos taken indoors look yellower than they used to, unless your camera has a specific white balance setting for fluorescent.

One of the settings where they'll have to pry the incandescent bulbs out of my cold dead hands is the bathroom mirror. Fluorescent bulbs make me even paler, the circles under my eyes even bluer, and various blotches even redder. It also makes my makeup look gray and dull. The ladies room at my church has overhead fluorescents, which is a problem because that's where brides get ready. They are nervous enough without looking in the mirror and seeing a Tim Burton character!

But there is a solution, offered to us by science! Colors of light can be expressed in numbers! Any photographer knows this. It's called color temperature. Sunlight is 5600K, and incandescent light is 3200K. It's the reason why shooting indoor film outside gives you bluish pictures, and outdoor film will give you orange pictures if you use it inside. There are filters to correct this. Why aren't light bulb colors expressed this way.

Or maybe they are. As I was looking at light bulbs, I saw that some of them did in fact have the color temperature written on the box. The "Daylight" compact fluorescents had "6500K" written down the side. The only problem is, that's 900K bluer than daylight, which I can attest to, having accidentally bought two of the hideous things. One actually worked quite well up inside the ductwork in my former mad science lab. But I have no place where the other doesn't offend the eye. There is no bulb that looks like daylight, except those ones that plants like, and they're too hot to use. Now, color temperature is hardly common knowledge, but you would think that someone involved in the manufacture of light bulbs would have studied lighting at some point.

So, nice try, but until somebody puts a real measure of both brightness and color temperature on light bulbs, I don't think everyone should be forced to make the switch. It's just one example of ecomentalists making our lives smaller, meaner, and less beautiful. That and Sunchip bags.

2 comments:

  1. Gah, the Sunchip bags! I think the Greenshirts just passed Puritanism and attained outright Flagellarian status! How else explain their punishment cars, punishment clothes, punishment food and now punishment chip-bags? It's all penance for some perceived socio-economic or ecological sins.

    As for the lightbulbs, it does my heart good to know there's a way to quantify those things. I personally wish everything was like bullets—every box of ammo has the cartridge type, bullet weight, and powder load, written conveniently on the box.

    Are they really going to ban incandescent bulbs, or are they posturing? Or are their opponents posturing? Honestly I'm starting to have trouble separating the real ideas from the rhetoric and counter-rhetoric and all of it.

    Things will be different when I take over the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They are not posturing. This was passed by Congress a while back, even before Obamunism held sway, and they will start phasing out incandescent bulbs next year. They are starting with 120 watt bulbs, then banning a level lower each successive year. Apparently specialty bulbs will be exempt (so for now your Christmas lights are safe, even the big C5 ones) but I doubt that will last. There have been a couple attempts to repeal the ban, but they can't get through the Senate (yet!)

    This may seem like a small deal now, but once fluorescent bulbs (which we do not manufacture in this country, btw) don't have to compete with cheap incandescent bulbs, they will become expensive. Witness Europe, where a light bulb costs anywhere from 7 to 14 Euros! That does not even include the horrid LED ones, which can cost as much as $50! I'm not spending $300 (assuming just one light per room, which is unlivable) to light my house when I can do it now for under $6. Even if the LED last 50 times longer (a big if, given real-world variables), it does not justify the up-front cost. Plus, like all leftist policies, this hurts the poor most of all.

    I refuse to go quietly while some Gaea cult tears down all the arches and re-primitives the planet!

    ReplyDelete